Start main page content

NPA’s ‘stolen’ #GuptaLeaks claim won’t stand in SA law

- TalkRadio 702

Stolen or not, Associate Professor James Grant says SA courts have discretion whether to admit evidence.

Speaking on TalkRadio 702's morning show, Breakfast with Xolani Gwala, Grant says the ‘fruits of a poisoned tree’ doctrine used by the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) in the #GuptaLeaks case isn’t valid in South African law.

City Press reported on Sunday that prosecutors investigating state capture believe the #GuptaLeaks emails do not constitute evidence against President Jacob Zuma’s friends, the Guptas or any other minister or individuals. Senior prosecutors, who spoke to City Press, also do not think the emails will be admitted into evidence because prosecutors and investigators believe they were ‘stolen’.

But Grant says in South Africa a court can make that decision even if evidence was unlawfully obtained.

This article was originally published on www.702.co.za.

Share

Giving to Wits

School of Public Health Building

Whether you invest in a promising young student, or contribute towards vital research or new buildings and facilities – giving to Wits brings great personal satisfaction and lasting results you can be proud of for years to come.

Give to Wits